MCA Notification on minimum default of INR 1 Crore applies prospectively, clarifies NCLAT
The Hon’ble NCLAT clarified that the notification of MCA increasing the minimum amount of default to INR 1 Crore shall be applicable prospectively.
Read MoreWhen there’s no wisdom, how come “Commercial Wisdom”?
An interesting case where the Adjudicating Authority made critical comments on the so-called Commercial Wisdom of the Committee of Creditors. It emphasised that the CoC has not at all applied its mind and that there was no element of wisdom displayed, leave alone the ‘commercial wisdom’…
Read MoreAppointment of IRP/RP by Financial Creditors – Still call it a fair game play?
The Author made an attempt to expose adverse effects of possible collusion of Insolvency Professionals and Financial Creditors.
Read MoreJUDICIAL INTERVENTION AND IBC
The article tries to establish how the judicial intervention of NCLT, NCLAT and Supreme Court helped establish the objective of the IBC
Read MoreEX-EMPLOYEE OF FINANCIAL CREDITOR CANNOT ACT AS IRP/RP
The NCLAT upheld the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority holding that apprehension of biasness raised by the Corporate Debtor cannot be dismissed offhand and that NCLT is justified in changing the IRP.
Read MoreNCLT HAS THE POWER TO EXCLUDE THE PERIOD OF DELAY IN APPOINTING THE “RP” IN PLACE OF THE “IRP”: NCLAT
NCLT HAS THE POWER TO EXCLUDE THE PERIOD OF DELAY IN APPOINTING THE “RP” IN PLACE OF THE “IRP”: NCLAT CASE SUMMARY Mrs. Vandana Garg – Appellant vs Reliance Capital Ltd. & Anr. – Respondent (Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 603 of 2019) Order dated July 2, 2019 by Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya (Chairperson), Justice A.I.S.
Read MoreMONEY RECEIVED AS LOAN WITH REGARD TO FUTURE SUPPLIES OF MATERIAL BE TREATED AS FINANCIAL DEBT: NCLAT
MONEY RECEIVED AS LOAN WITH REGARD TO FUTURE SUPPLIES OF MATERIAL BE TREATED AS FINANCIAL DEBT: NCLAT CASE SUMMARY Gaurav Agrawal, Director M/s. Albus India Ltd. – Appellant vs M/s Tuf Metallurgical (P) Ltd. & M/s Albus India Ltd. – Respondents (Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.212 of 2019) Order dated September 4, 2019 by
Read MorePF, PENSION AND GRATUITY CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS LIQUIDATION ESTATE UNDER IBC: NCLAT
PF, PENSION AND GRATUITY CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS LIQUIDATION ESTATE UNDER IBC: NCLAT CASE SUMMARY STATE BANK OF INDIA – Appellant vs MOSER BAER KARAMCHARI UNION & ANR – Respondent (COMPANY APPEAL (AT)(INSOLVENCY) NO. 396 of 2019) Order dated 19.08.2019 by Justice S.J.MUKHOPADHAYA and Justice A.I.S. CHEEMA 1. Issue in Consideration Whether the provident fund,
Read More