The power of the Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India (the “IBBI”) to levy fee of 0.25% of the professional fee earned for services rendered as an IP in the preceding financial year and also 0.25% of the turnover of an IPE in the preceding financial year and the regulations thereof were challenged before the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Madras.
An interesting case where the Adjudicating Authority made critical comments on the so-called Commercial Wisdom of the Committee of Creditors. It emphasised that the CoC has not at all applied its mind and that there was no element of wisdom displayed, leave alone the ‘commercial wisdom’…
The Supreme Court rejected the plea of depositors of DHFL and opined that it is not inclined to interfere with the decision of CoC. This article is an attempt to explore FRDI Bill assuming DHFL is being resolved under FRDI.
“GOVERNING LAW” CLAUSE OF AN AGREEMENT CANNOT RESTRICT THE JURISDICTION OF NCLT: NCLAT CASE SUMMARY EXCEL METAL PROCESSORS LIMITED – Appellant Vs BENTELER TRADING INTERNATIONAL